Відео

"Cultural Marxism" is a right wing dog whistle that fascists use when they see that the people are waking up to their injustices and they try to guise it through some Red Scare bullshit that's easier for the masses to swallow. It has nothing to do with Marxism or economics, it's purely a tool used by fascists in their war against the people.

The right loves this silly concept.

People need to wake up destroying the Economy is part of their agenda? Just like another war

so he just basically said 'you can make money if you just service us from the outskirts' as if we needed to you in the first place

The factories went to China and economic activity went with them. They ran away from high taxes and unions. The only thing left behind were the liberal voters. You get what you vote for!

😮 you lay out a plan for class division by pushing out poor people to accommodate wealthy professionals and let the poor people be servants for those wealthy individuals and families. That is an awful idea. You are talking about CLASS DIVISION and only care for the wealthy, not for the poor. You are an old man and talking such nonsense is a shame stimulating yourself in public or else you are stupid and dumb not considering human capital issues for the poor.

I’ve seen plenty of cartoon episodes with anti-gentrification. It’s so one-sided.

FUCK GENTRIFICATION!!!!!

GENTRIFICATION = WHITE SUPREMACY

Low taxes work. a great example is Ireland. 40 Years ago it was a very poor Country, they have had very low corporation tax for years and now it is one of the richest Countries in the World and they have never collected so much tax. Its common sense really.

Thank you for this video

Don't believe this greedy pos. Gentrification is not good and only lines to pocket of rich. gentrification = poor people suffer rich people win. Explain gentrification for what it is.

We once had a middle class created and based on Keynesian thinking. Then Voodoo Economics took hold and we have paid bitterly for it ever since.

If people no matter what their income took a little pride in their communities and properties and maintained them….there wouldn’t be much left to gentrify..

This is a very bias video🫤

You could be more direct. This is slow.

After working in the field for several years , I couldn’t help but come to the conclusion that “gentrification” is just a term someone came up with once they realized poverty was “too hard” a problem to figure out and wanted something new to talk about/publish/apply for grants with/etc. The “gentrification” is just somebody from outside our neighborhood finally seeing value in our neighborhood…that’s a good thing. The bad thing is that they can outbid me for (enter whatever we’re competing for here)…in other words, my problem isn’t that my neighborhood is now valued by more people, it’s that I can’t afford it…aka, my poverty!…which is what we should’ve been addressing in the first place…and which is what I’m going to have to keep working on wherever my new home is. Personally, I wish we would focus on programs that facilitate economic mobility…once that’s achieved, it brings people “options”/“choices” …once we have that, we can live wherever we want. Remember, “displacement” doesn’t just mean I had to move, it means I had to move somewhere i when i didn’t want to. If my “new home” is some place I like, then I’m fine with it (as long as I like it as much as my old neighborhood anyway). Anyway, just my two cents. I hate to see “hip new concepts” take over the conversations when the original problems still haven’t been fixed yet.

You Think You Are A Good Person

ua-cam.com/users/shortsN3KWDgltmF4?feature=share

"gentrification affects a broad set of outcomes for incumbent adults and children. Gentrification modestly increases out-migration, though movers are not made observably worse off and aggregate neighborhood change is driven primarily by changes to in-migration. At the same time, many original resident adults stay and benefit from declining poverty exposure and rising house values. Children benefit from increased exposure to neighborhood characteristics known to be correlated with economic opportunity, and some are more likely to attend and complete college. Our results suggest that accommodative policies, such as increasing housing supply in high-demand urban areas, could increase the opportunity benefits we find, reduce out-migration pressure, and promote long-term affordability" Brummet, Quentin and Reed, "The Effects of Gentrification on the Well-Being and Opportunity of Original Resident Adults and Children", 2019.

1:43 to say how to pronounce the last name and all that time dedicated to insult him!

Convincing .... tough not to be bitter about the situation but you persuaded me enough to admit that gentrification is neither good or bad but dependant on how one adapts to it.

it must be so nice to be born into wealth and privilege and give lectures on how stupid the poor are for wanting socialism.

It's about levels isn't it After the pandemic. The wealthy can live and communicate online

It’s racist for white people if you flee or when you move in lol there’s no winning. Overall Gentrification makes neighborhoods safe and Black household owners who did the right thing much more happy.

Gentrification is only a positive if you own vs rent and have the capital to move. It's expensive to move for people who are living paycheck to paycheck.

Miss ya Robert

Keynes litterally saved USA's ass. Y'all capitalists are just too dumb to understand it.

This video completely ignores the fact that gentrification more often than not causes homelessness.

Say's Law was clarified by James Mill in 'Commerce Defended' and by Hutt in his 'Rehabilitation of Say's Law' The value of supply creates an equivalent value in demand in non-competing markets. (Hutt)

:(

Gentrification only benefits the highly skilled and the rich. It doesn't benefit the poor. Quit lying.

Thanks!

Real estate is violence

Investments were always happening--even in 1950. What we are seeing today that s different is a lack of individualism. The investments of today are corporate and serve the global rich. It is conformist and cookie cutter. If you want to experience an interesting history artsy used-t-be town, you will have to visit a museum.

SO YOUR SUGAR COATING RACIST GENTRIFICATION. ? SOME WHITE PEOPLE NEVER CEASE TO DISAPPOINT. THE WILL ALWAYS DISREGARD N DISRESPECT

Is this satire?

This dude is criminally misinformed. This video is legit laughable.

I love this!

Gentrification is a modern word for Genocide. It can be argued that colonial settlers "Gentrified" america when they stole land from the indigenous people. This is a practice of mass manipulation,on all sides. in the 1950's America disinvested in public transit infrastructure (getting rid of trolleys.trains) and invested in highways and suburbs,whites were 'ENCOURAGED" to move to segregated,all white surburb's with home ownership, I.E Levittown's. Black and latinos were 'encouraged" to live in inner city communities in rental housing,mush of it built by the government(THE PROJECTS),banks red lined the inner city,media painted it as dangerous and it became slums,60 years later, the suburbs have become a stale,lifeless,boring nowhere. they ran out of land, so they backtracked decided the inner city is the new frontier. banks stopped redlining. the government created tax breaks,and renters are easy to remove. the media changed the narrative from "Dangerous" to 'Hip,Cool,Up and Coming",suburbanites wanting an exciting life of bars,pubs and dog walking parks were fleeced into paying 3 times the price for the small space, a place there parents ran from decades ago. Gentrification is mass manipulation,a conspiritorial plot by the elites.

I'm working class but enjoy seeing poor people get mad and do nothing over and over. I have no problem with it

The point of optimality is when government has zero revenue and zero spending.

"The warehouse people" should have made his tongue bleed.

Does the Sunday link not work anymore?

Could upzoning help "cores" last longer - easing the transition?

This analysis is embarrassingly bad. It’s basically a terrible rehash of the individual consumer theory.

I agree that the role of velocity in inflation is not well understood, but instead of supporting that assertion it’s 10% claiming velocity is meaningless because it isn’t the sole determinant of inflation, and 90% complaining about economists trying to understand economic phenomena.

i just now heard. oh no.

RIP Bob.

I am stunned at his loss. He was a lovely man (a “good” gossip and also helped me learn to pronounce Koch (coke) brothers) and will be deeply missed.